Welcome to Save Mitchell-Lama Welcome to Save Mitchell-Lama


 
Search
_TOPICS
  Login/Create an Account    

Menu
· Home
· Content
· Downloads
· FAQ
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Web Links

Search



Links
Housing Links
MAPS of Mitchell-Lamas
Tenants & Neighbors
Mitchell Lama Residents Coalition
Met Council on Housing
NYS DHCR
NYC HPD
LawHelp for New Yorkers
NY Lawyers for the Public Interest
Housing Conservation Coordinators
Eviction Intervention Services
Real Rent Reform Campaign
Rent Guidelines Board
Tenants PAC
Housing Here & Now
Community Service Society
Community Research Group (CRG)
List of Resources for Tenants
How to Sue Landlord for Repairs (Video)
Rent Stabilization Code
Tenant Net

Mitchell-Lamas in Jeopardy

Thousands of Mitchell-Lama apartments in New York City -- created by a wonderfully successful NYS middle-income housing program -- are facing extinction. This website primarily concerns rentals. If you want to keep your Mitchell-Lama co-op in the program, contact Co-operators United For Mitchell-Lama.

The year your building was built makes a difference!.

What happens to those of us in Mitchell-Lamas depends on court interpretation of regulations, and whether the apparent Democratic majority of the State Legislature passes new legislation.


This home page has the most recent announcements and articles. Click on the various categories on the right side for additional material.

  • The CALENDAR includes events regarding affordable housing.

  • To find your legislators and learn more about your building and its history, click on "FIND YOUR BUILDING" here or on the right panel.

  • Click on LEGISLATION for the status of pending bills this term.

  • Find tenant association resources -- including

  • "TAKING ACTION" suggests what we can do, and

  • "EVENTS" is a record of coming and past events in the Affordable Housing movement.

Media Coverage: Espada propses landlord give-back in guise of tenant bill

NY State Senator Pedro Espada proposed a bill that merges a landlord wish with a tenant gimmick. In fact, it is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

The bill would permit landlords to take apartments out of rent stabilization even though they have J-51 tax breaks. This would reverse the Roberts decision by the state's highest court.

Thus as happened at Stuyvesant Town, landlords who repaid the J-51 tax benefits could deregulate apartments that were rent stabilized or rent controlled even BEFORE the building ever got J-51 benefits. This deregulation (invalidated by the state's highest court in Roberts) occurs

  • when the apartment is vacant and the owner makes improvements to raise the rent to $2000 or more, or

  • when the people living in the apartment have a household income of $175,000 or more for 2 consecutive years.

Worse still, this bill is so sloppily written that attorney Seth Miller has expressed concern that the bill could potentially let landlords de-regulate all rent regulated apartments in buildings whose J-51 benefits are repaid - by reclassifying those apartments as never having been subject to the rent stabilization law.

The bill would also freeze the rents of stabilized tenants with annual incomes under $45,000. This is consistent with the landlords' position that only the poorest tenants should have rent stabilized apartments (the middle-class be damned.) It ignores the fact that when vacant apartments were de-regulated between 1971 and 1974, the result was a massive housing emergency, ended only by the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974.

RESOURCES:


Posted by sue on Thursday, February 18 @ 13:18:58 CST (16 reads)
(Read More... | 13741 bytes more | Media Coverage)

Real Rent Reform has a new website

The Real Rent Reform Campaign has a new website. Check it out!


Posted by sue on Wednesday, February 10 @ 21:05:40 CST (23 reads)
(Read More... )

Rent stabilized tenants protected by court decision

The State Supreme (lowest ) Court has ruled that rent stabilized tenants may not be penalized with higher rent increases just because their rent is under $1000 and they have lived in their apartments for 6 years or more.

In Casado v. Markus, Justice Emily Jane Goodman ruled that the Rent Guidelines Board cannot create a whole new class of people to get a different percentage rent increase. As she put it, the RGB is penalizing "tenants failing to move in a city that has virtually no affordable housing."

Click here for an unofficial copy of the decision. Click on "read more" below for more information.


Posted by sue on Monday, February 01 @ 19:08:06 CST (61 reads)
(Read More... | 1125 bytes more )

Taking Action: Protest: Espada named Senate housing chair - AGAIN

State Senate Democratic Conference Leader has named Pedro Espada chair of the Senate's housing committee - again.

This is despite Espada's assurances to landlords that they have nothing to fear, and the fact that no important tenant bill got passed in the Senate last term. In fact, he pulled a coup (changing over to the Republicans) on the day he and Hiram Monserrate (convicted of battering his companion) were to have passed the repeal of vacancy decontrol.

Protest! Send a letter (click on "read more" below for a sample) or call his office to complain: (518) 455-2788 or (718) 649-7653.


Posted by sue on Wednesday, January 06 @ 21:25:33 CST (74 reads)
(Read More... | 2187 bytes more | Taking Action)

DHCR Commissioner resigns

Deborah Van Amerongen is resigning as head of the NYS Division of Housing and Community Renewal.

Then-Governor Eliot Spitzer appointed her in a move well-appreciated by tenants.

Her resignation is effective January 15, 2010.

Click here for Gov. Paterson's announcement.


Posted by sue on Wednesday, December 30 @ 14:12:44 CST (77 reads)
(Read More... )

Media Coverage: R3 Video on Tenant Activism and R3 program

The Real Rent Reform Campaign (R3) has made a video, Real Rent Reform / Housing Here & Now - 2009 Year In Review for our Campaign about two main issues:

  • the repeal of vacancy decontrol, and
  • saving Mitchell-Lamas.

Watch it by clicking on: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUOfOItKbn8.

While the video does not mention that pre-1974 buildings leaving Mitchell-Lama go into rent stabilization with the threat of "unique or peculiar circumstances," R3 supports the Stabilization for All bill, S 3326-A /A. 9230 (same as 4359-A) .

Contact R3 and let them know you think it is important too!

Click on "read more" below for more action that you can take.


Posted by sue on Friday, December 18 @ 20:11:13 CST (64 reads)
(Read More... | 2152 bytes more | Media Coverage)

Media Coverage: Former Mitchell-Lama tenants at 3333 Broadway

Conditions at 3333 Broadway, a former post-1973 Mitchell-Lama, are described in a recent article in The Uptowner

Click on "read more" below for the article.


Posted by sue on Tuesday, December 15 @ 13:41:47 CST (141 reads)
(Read More... | 8294 bytes more | Media Coverage)

Media Coverage: Predatory equity and the banks

City Limits recently reported on a demonstration against the Dime bank - resulting in a conversation with tenants of the run-down buildings that Dime financed.

The Urban Homesteading Assistance Board (UHAB) and the Association of Neighborhood and Housing Development (ANHD) have played an important part in getting predatory equity out and responsible management in. Click on "read more" below for the article.


Posted by sue on Monday, December 14 @ 22:32:52 CST (77 reads)
(Read More... | 11010 bytes more | Media Coverage)

Stuy Tenants Settle with Tishman Speyer

Tenants at Stuyvesant Town / Peter Cooper Village have reached an agreement with owner Tishman Speyer concerning rent reductions following the NYS Court of Appeals' ruling that apartments may not be taking out of rent stabilization while the owner gets J-51 benefits.

For a copy of the interim agreement, click: Court Order on Stuy Town Interim Agreement [The Justice System]. For more on the arrangement and background, click on "read more" below.


Posted by sue on Monday, December 14 @ 16:40:53 CST (84 reads)
(Read More... | 3640 bytes more )

Legal Cases & Papers: State Sup. Ct. denies Landlords' U or P Claims

On November 25, 2009, Justice Alice Schlesinger of New York State Supreme Court

  • ruled that DHCR's November 2007 regulations on "unique or peculiar circumstances" are valid, and

  • sent the case back to DHCR to determine within 150 days the thousands of "unique or peculiar" applications pending regarding 24 buildings state-wide.

Click here for a copy of the decision (and click here for the corrected caption). Click on "read more" below for a summary.

Click here for a chart of the case as of December 7, 2009.


Posted by sue on Tuesday, December 01 @ 20:11:50 CST (99 reads)
(Read More... | 5251 bytes more | Legal Cases & Papers)

Categories Menu
· All Categories
· About Us
· Basic Information
· Calendar
· Events
· Find Your Building
· Legal Cases & Papers
· Legislation
· MAIN
· Media Coverage
· Old Articles
· Organize Tenants
· Taking Action



For legal advice, please consult your tenant association's attorney.
Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.071 Seconds